Breaking News : Join us in Thousand Likes Gathering and stand a chance to win an IPAD Air and submit your article and journals to us if you wish to join as journalist! Contact us @ klsetechanalyst@gmail.com for detail information
Over the past decade, with the rapid development of
technological advances and in the area of Information and Communication
Technology, vast amounts of personal information are being transmitted,
collected, stored and used daily. This in turn opens up an opportunity for
processing and also mis-processing of personal data resulting in mounting
pressure for data protection law to be enacted around the world. Recently,
there has been considerable hype in the Asia-Pacific region in relation to
privacy regulations. Malaysia has quietly
gazetted its Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA), effective immediately,
and given businesses three months to ensure compliance. Even though the
Personal Data Protection Act 2010 has come into force, but the public will have
to do their part to make it effective. The rising menace of debt collectors is
caused by the lackadaisical attitude of Bank Negara, which show that the
creditors could reveal private data of a customer to a third party despite
Malaysia having enacted the Personal Data Protection Act 2010.
Data has become an integral part of life in today's world,
and thanks to the advent of digital technology, collecting, editing, sharing
and transferring data have never been easier. Personal data, which includes
identity card numbers, addresses and bank account details, is now the most
valuable commodity as well as the most dangerous weapon. The enforcement of the
personal data protection law is thus not only timely, but also necessary, to
protect the safety and privacy of consumers who have been left too long at the
scruples of companies and organisations when it comes to their personal data.
After all, can you remember the last time your day has not been interrupted by
unsolicited phone calls, text or e-mail messages offering a product or service
that you must have or event that you cannot miss?
Data users don’t need consent from subjects for the
performance of a contract, such as the details you provide a bank when opening
an account, as most of them will be used to perform the contract with the
consumer. But if the bank uses the personal data for marketing or other
ancillary things, they have to specify in the notice to give consumer
transparency. Another circumstance in which data users are allowed to bypass
the Act’s general principle is if they have an obligation under another law.
This means that the PDPA becomes secondary when there is another Act that
overrides it. However, the Act entrusts a degree of responsibility on the data
user, as seen in its Security Principle and Data Integrity Principle. The
former requires a data user to protect the personal data from any loss, misuse,
or unauthorised access or disclosure, while the latter states that it is the
responsibility of the data user to ensure the personal data they have is
accurate, complete and up to date.
it is
important for consumers to know their rights as stipulated in the Act: “right
to access, right to correct data, right to prevent damage or distress, right to
withdraw from data processing, right to prevent direct marketing, and very
critically right to bring complaint on data abuses to PDP Commissioners. The
right of access to personal data and right to correct their personal data
allows data subjects to make a request to check and verify their information.
Any personal data deemed inaccurate can be corrected or struck off the record.
To exercise both rights, the consumer will need to make a request in writing to
the data user, to which the company or organisation will have to comply within
21 days.
Another important data-subject right
provided by the Act is the right to withdraw consent. This provision drives in
the message that when a consumer gives consent for their personal data to be
processed, it is not forever. When consent is withdrawn, the data user will
have to stop processing the personal data. Failure to do so is an offence that
carries a fine of up to RM100,000 or a maximum one-year jail, or both.
Taking heed of the public's
distress over the rampant unsolicited telemarketing messages, the enforcement
of the PDPA will give them the right to ask telemarketers to stop their
communications (SMS, e-mail, calls, etc), even if prior consent has been
obtained. Failure to comply will cost the direct marketing companies a maximum
of RM200,000 fine or jail term up to two years, or both.
Consumers should quickly identify
people or companies who have been using their personal data without their
knowledge, their consent or otherwise in contrary with the original purpose
that they consented to initially. But no worries, we will not risk our members’
personal details by disclosing the data to anyone, it is safe to register as
our member!
No comments:
Post a Comment